Most lawyers believe that schools can at best ban cellphone use under certain conditions and circumstances. First, it is widely believed that schools cannot make their own rules at will. You must provide a legal basis for this and abide by the principle of proportionality. The federal and state school laws form the basis for this, but most of them only require general requirements: schools may stipulate in school regulations the measures for fulfilling their educational and teaching obligations. This can include restricting the use of mobile phones. This often leads to disputes between the employees involved: Cell Phone Jammers Once the use of the cell phone is stopped, what if they violate the cell phone? Because banning the use of mobile phones can also affect the basic rights of Mr. B. Free corporate development and property rights must be commensurate. In addition, parents can have legal rights, so parents must also be considered when contacting children through mobile phones. It must be proportional. In addition, parents can have legal rights, so parents must also be considered when contacting children through mobile phones. It must be proportional. In addition, parents may have legal rights,
At present, the clear tendency of lawyers to control the use of mobile phones is almost unrecognizable: the Baden-Württemberg State Ministry of Education, for example, also believes that it is wise to prohibit the use of mobile phones during breaks. However, it is up to the school as long as group rules can be properly formulated in accordance with educational requirements.
Special situation for official exams: Mobile phones can be banned, and official exams are usually more severe. Therefore, teachers are usually asked to put their mobile phones on the teacher’s desk or other places, and the mobile phones they carry can be considered fake. It also depends on group status and detailed rules of school and exam rules and federal school laws. For schools, “secondary evidence” can be enough to defraud others. This means that the school can try to defraud Mr. whether or not the behavior is typical. If Mr. disagrees, he must show that his case is atypical—that is,
According to the judgment of the Karlsruhe Administrative Court, it is usually sufficient to carry a mobile phone with you, so that introspection can be classified as “unqualified”. Provided that the inspection statute regulates such results for “unauthorized resources”, this applies anyway. In a detailed dispute, a gentleman left his mobile phone in a handbag in a room during a written test. However, because the school did not explicitly state the ban again before the detailed reflection, the subsequent ratings of “unsatisfactory” for the specific situation were disproportionate. The school had to alter the results again. If there is a cell phone jammer at this time, you can get the same effect without having to check your cell phone.
Bavaria has a special state law. In 2006, the school banned the use of mobile phones. Unless it is used for “pedagogical purposes”, students must close their mobile phones “in the school premises”, except for teachers (section 56 of the Bavarian Education Act). Other federal states have special rules for schools.
